Anybody that did this knows wtf they did unless they had zero common sense. Honestly, nobody is this stupid.
1 Like
How can you say that? I’m still asking you how it fits the normal definition of win-trading and you can’t. How are the players suppose to know that? It’s called a grey area. You’re just looking at everything black and white.
Because anyone that is not a moron would know sitting in a fort with the opposite faction and just swapping the fort back and forth for fast and easy xp would know its win trading. Are you one of those morons that dont?
1 Like
I already made my argument as to why it’s not. You clearly don’t know what win-trading is.
Since when did game mechanics (capturing forts) become an exploit. If someone captures a fort after you capture it, is that exploiting? Like, none of this makes any sense. Just remove the mechanic if its “exploiting” lol
I have a vague memory that you are one of those going on in every thread like this and that I have already silenced you. Whoops, don’t know how that got “lifted”, but reapplying.
Not really worth having discussion when the guy doesn’t even read what I have written and when the arguments end just calling others stupid etc.
Just for the record, once again. I have not mentioned term “win trading” in any of my posts. Nor am I in confusion if 25 greens and 25 purples trading constantly fort is cheating. That is a simple and clear case. MY QUESTION is when does the fort capturing become cheating or something wrong? It is very obvious that you are not cheating if you never go to fort. These are the easy ones to define, the black and white. But what about all the other shades in between. Once again: Which cases are wrong and which right. Where does the line go?
It would be great if Amazon Game Studios would give a more clear definition than they have, but I guess they changed the capture time to 10 or 15mins and all is fixed and forgotten by now.
Truest ive seen in all honesty the only people left playing this game have already sunk too much in if your not doing the META with everything in this game your just Wasting Your Time period.
So if I leave my wallet open, that’s on me. If AGS choose to mess everything up all the time, that’s on AGS!
1 Like
Whats clear is that you dont.
Two opposing factions. All in the same area. Not fighting. Trading spawns for rewards. Its the same as kill trading. This is common sense to anyone thats not a moron.
What???
Which is not win-trading, even defined by AGS.
Its no surprise that you’re unable to define win-trading. All you can do is either say that you’re right because AGS said so or that I’m wrong because I’m wrong and you’re right.
Holy crap you are the most dense person I have ever met in my life.
Could say the same about you.
Because I have already defined it instead of giving the generic definition you are looking for from google. I also gave examples of it. Just because you put your fingers in your ears and go lalalalalalla doesnt mean I didnt already do what you have asked. It was win trading before and its win trading now. AGS has defined it as such. End.
Where did you define it?
Here would you like some generic definitions from google that you can mental gymnastics around instead of the examples I gave at least a few times in this thread…
Theres two from two different MMOs. Anybody that has played MMOs knows exactly what win trading is considered. The only people that dont see fort trading back and forth to climb PVP ranks easily and most efficiently are either people who are doing it or people who are complete morons. Its common sense that fort trading is win trading.
Mental gymnastics all you want. This is my last reply to you.
On Camelot a bunch of losers are using this to mass report the leadership and war roster of the top company on the server.
Some people just dont see being wrong as the great opportunity to learn something new that it is.
1 Like
They punish players but do nothing with Boys
This topic was automatically closed 21 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.