Can we (are we allowed) to create add-ons to the game? An example of what Im thinking of is an addon that lets you swap entire gear sets at once, something easily written…so I’m just wondering if we will get banned for something like this.
1 Like
Yes, that would be bannable for sure.
if they cant detect it, its good!
Please send me a link if you make one.
Cant punish what they cant detect.
2 Likes
I would say, maybe you could outline your idea in the feedback section.
@Fourseven It sounds like you know what you’re doing from the confidence so surely there is some skeleton work you could do to work out any kinks or whatever they could expect maybe, idek. It’d be sick if we could swap out sets, the devs may have some argument about immersion or something. As a PvP player I could see it maybe getting annoying someone swapping to full heavy Sword and Shield/Lifestaff or something, I would still want the option though personally.
1 Like
Yes seeing as NW is written in LUA for most UI and frontend related things it shouldn’t be a problem to make. Would have to make it out of combat only for sure or it would ruin PvP, but I’ll see if I get some free time I’ll throw something together that I could show the CA/Devs and see what they say
1 Like
idk homie they said they didnt even really know if they liked the mini map that much, this might be risky
That is absolutely not allowed.
2.5 Restrictions. You may use the Games only as permitted by this Agreement and applicable law. You may not, and you will not assist or authorize any other person to: (i) reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble, or otherwise tamper with, the Game Clients and associated Game Content; (ii) sell, rent, lease, lend, loan, distribute, transfer, or sublicense the Games, or act as a host or matchmaking service for the Games without our consent, or otherwise facilitate any unauthorized connection that emulates portions of the Games; (iii) copy, modify, alter, or otherwise create derivative works of the Games (except as expressly permitted by us in an applicable policy posted on our websites); or (iv) interfere with or circumvent any feature of the Games, access or use the Games in a way intended to avoid fees or restrictions, or otherwise exploit the Games (including by intercepting, collecting, scraping, mining, or reading data from the Games, or using applications or services such as hacks, bots, cheats, scripts, or mods that are not expressly permitted by us in an applicable policy posted on our websites).
It looks like it was an awesome thought however not allowed 
I hope that you see fit to outline a verbal structure on the feedback forums (I’d be sure to throw a like), a verbal outline of the generic concept (however accurately you could find to describe without going into fiddly stuff) should stay within rules. It’s a good idea too and surely they’d embrace any QoL changes to combat recent consumer malcontent.
1 Like
So basically, it’s only alright if they give their approval first. Shame.
No harm in trying for their approval.
That would be the only way all of the massive number or QOL issues will ever be fixed. AGS developers are simply way to lazy to address them. With that being very apparent open it up and let 3rd party developers do the job AGS developers are too lazy to do.
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.