Say for example. Dry tree 1 and dry tree 2 If there are 6 servers in total, you should open 6 sub-servers. Territory wars are not a problem.
Make the server player limit 1k and open 4-5 sub channels. That’s the only need
More than 1000 players cause lag and bugs. Why can’t you see them yet?
Uppp
How would a subserver work exactly?
same chat
same trading POST
Everything will be the same.
And Eu servers are full again
or simply, make channel for servers.
channel 1, channel 2 etc
+1
Make the server player limit 1k and open 4-5 sub channels. That’s the only need
More than 1000 players cause lag and bugs. Why can’t you see them yet?
If this is possible i 100% support that idea, imagine group finding on that. So much easier
Yes. Good idea
cool idea but i think you have a few holes:)
one example company A controls everfall fort in open world, would fighting and defending be only available on instance/layer 1? so if my alliance goes in instance 1 and fills the player limit, the others can not defend
wouldn’t be better if they created more instanced systems with cross server matchmaking?
Bump
Unfortunately you’re talking about redesigning server infustructure which they’ll never do in the short term.
Every server just needs one spillover server that is a copy of the main server (updated a few times per day). While on the spillover you still in the queue for the main. No wars.
If you’re on a war roster scheduled for that day, you get priority or something.
You can incentive the spillover for people who don’t care for the “territory” stuff.
Fun idea but not gonna work with the current systems. Besides that there are more important stuff to focus on.
This topic was automatically closed 21 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.