I say the same stuff over and over, but I’m having fun.
Duos should fight other Duos. If there are no other duos they should have to wait.
If that’s not possible, then duoing shouldn’t be allowed, and trios should be the only option for people wanting to group. I suppose the OPs idea would be fine too.
This issue should be addressed before leaderboards are released because people will abuse duoing to climb the ranks.
yes.
or another group of 2 + a random.
wouldnt that suck for that 1 random person to be matched with them? i’d rather either 3 premade or only solo queue
Ok so what do you do with the third slot? Drag some random solo queuer into a 3v2+1?
Is that not worse than 2+1vs2+1?
As been pointed out 2v3 doesn’t work. But you should just not be able to queue duo. Just make solo queue or team queue only (3).
it would encourage people to form complete groups or just solo.
better to suck for one on the team of two than suck for 3 randoms, but it’s still a problem.
it is, but also better than 1+1+1v2+1 imo.
lol this math is getting weird.
How is the 1 player slot for the duo team going to be filled if all solo players queue in the solo queue?
Right. Like I said before, it would encourage people to for a full group or solo.
I don’t really think that 3 different q’s for 3v3 would work.
If they made entirely separate arenas though…(1v1, 2v2, 5v5, etc)
On second thought, just make arena unqueueable if you have 2 people in group. Make a prompt that says ‘need another player to queue for this’.
Yeah 
Solo Q and triple Q is a great idea imo
ROFLMAO.
So they play what, 2 vs 3?
As the solo players will queue into the solo queue?
Where is the logic?
2(1) v 3 isnt logical but 1(2) v 2(1) is logical?
So if I queue with a friend just to have a good time, I get matched with a 3 squad of sweats?
They should just make a 1v1, 2v2, 3v3, 4v4 and 5v5 queue system for Arenas. To do so, they would need to have many more Arena maps.
if I solo just to have fun, I get matched with a duo(thats probably a healer + whatever btw) of sweats?
Neither of these outcomes are desirable.
i know lol.
Well then it seems like putting 2’s against 3’s makes as little sense as putting 2’s against 1’s.
So they either need different modes or we stick with what we have.