It feels like Anyone that tries to kick people out of invasions should get auto kicked instead. The server or game itself should be the only one to be able to use the “kick people out” power.
If people goes AFK in the mid of an Invasion the game should be able to do something about that but Never let 1 player have that power over 50 others, Especially if people out of those 50 are not any of the choosen by the player, they should have no power over who gets to play and who not.
Manipulating a PvE event like what is happening here should be a cause for permanently banning the Companies doing it. It is actively ruining a PvE activity meant to be enjoyed by everyone.
it is and an email following my ticket to support confirmed it. -
Hello ------,
This is a follow up e-mail regarding your query.
I am sorry the companies are kicking players out.
I thank you for reporting this.
We take instances of violation of policies seriously as it is harmful to the community and violates the following section of our Code of Conduct (https://www.amazon.com/help/ags/coc)
We will further investigate the matter and take action accordingly.
If you have any further queries, feel free to reach us again.
Have a wonderful day. Cheers!
We’d appreciate your feedback. Please use the buttons below to vote about your experience today.
Amazon Game Studios
I removed the agents name and mine for privacy concerns.#
So lets now wait and see if they do take any action at all.
Hopefully they do find way. Not being allowed to play just because other players want other people in Invasions is a real slap in the face
I dont doubt you. But the exploiters will.
Can you share a screenshot (and paint over the names?)
Thank you
Yeah let me get home. Give me 20 mins
The solution? Enemy factions should NOT be able to sign up for your wars or invasions at all, PERIOD.
It’s entirely contradictory, and can be abused, and takes away potential XP and rewards from your own faction members who lose a slot to another faction person.
No one can force you to lose the invasion because everone loses every invasion anyway lol.
You only win an invasion when the mobs get stuck and dont aggro the gates
Our company owns a city, we paid for the city, only we do the reduction infuelnce, and then someone cries that he can’t be in an invasion … In an invasion where he just runs confused. Thanks to such players, we lose up to five upgrades that cost us a lot of effort, money and an effort to prevent another faction from conquering the city. Apart from not being able to count one and one, Amazon certainly annoys players to do something in the game. Good work, your inability proves how the game runs out of interest, and only thanks to your inability.
[image]
They just need to remove the loss downgrades and not allow kicks. Then other factions can’t abuse it.
I think at the end of the day we can all agree even if we are for kicking or against, the system needs changing.
I don’t know about you, but 2000 people aren’t signing up for each invasion. Most people who signed up and are in the controlling faction get in.
This isn’t them saying its an exploit or whether or not its a bannable offense. Still, the current system needs to be changed and punishing players for that is dumb. Anyone advocating the banning of other players are just mad that they got kicked.
No one wants players from another faction in there invasion because you can just steal there siege parts and sit and watch while the invasion fails then declare war while the fort is weak. This is a tactic thats being used a good bit. That’s why no one wants other factions in there invasions without knowing the opposite faction members well.
So I guess the banning everyone is asking for should apply both ways here. If you steal siege parts you should be banned and if your company declares war and you are the one who stole siege parts they should be banned as well correct? this is the road all this “ban people because I didnt get picked for invasions’” crap is going…
This is exactly why Im not a fan of opposing faction from being in an invasion. Twice now, I’ve seen the opposing faction players publicly say they were hoping the invasion is a failure so they can watch the territory downgrade.
I’m sure not everyone of these factions are this way, but because of those that are, I refuse to take anyone not in my faction into these invasions, unless I know them personally.
disagree, but not totally
I hope that makes sense and I am willing to discuss disagreements in a respectful manner. I warn , if you talk nonsense to me and try to insult me I don’t mind being banned 
so please lets disagree or agree respectfully.
nah Bro. it is 100% violating the TOS. i mean it is mentioned several time that the ruling company can only select 10 members.
There is no room for interpretation here and this is 100% a bannable offense.
I think player will get away with it as it will be very hard to tell who did it and as A LOT of companies abused it, it would be a quite big number.
I also agree that the current system is lacking any real thought by AGS.
Should not be as the main company has no control over the griefing done which is almost 100% of the time by the other factions who join. I think all other factions should be bared from invasions without approval of the settlement owner as they can easily sabotage the invasion for there own benefit.
Stealing siege parts and sitting there and watching while the invasion fails only to still get payout while the enemy faction is forced to take fort downgrades so you can attack and declare war soon after. yet everyone cries about being apart of another faction and getting kicked.
As i said:
the invasion system does not make any sense.
The one actually hard PVE content that requires very good coordination, gear, communication andd teamwork to get anywhere near completion is also the one content where you cant choose your team?
BUT bad design does not give you a free pass to exploit the system as that gives you a giant advantage over companies following the rules.
