Let's talk about AGS support (again)

This got deleted so I’m gonna repost it word for word since I suspected this might happen:

I recently got unbanned from an unjust ban that came about from the (in my opinion) overzealous ban wave that occurred in late September due to the trophy and trading exploits. Let me tell you that fighting that wrongful ban was a painful journey and I had pretty much given up hope at getting unbanned but thankfully my last ditch effort gave fruit. There are still many who are wrongfully banned (I personally know of 2 others who didn’t do anything wrong but are still perma banned) which is what compels me to write this post.

The first thing I want to talk about is the lack of a human response when trying submitting appeals. For the first month of attempts the process went as follows: Submit a ticket, get an email saying it’s been received, and then finally getting a copy paste autoreply email (sometimes not even related to New World) stating that the ban is justified and will not be removed. I know these were automated as the replies were all over the place, sometimes it was about my ban in lost ark (I don’t play lost ark), sometimes it was about exploiting a bug, sometimes it was about using a cheating program and others it gave no reason for the ban but that it was justified. The worst part of this all is that when I reply asking for further clarity or what steps I can take I get no response despite receiving emails stating they’ll be in touch within 6 hours. The whole submitting a ticket feels like talking to a brick wall.

The second thing I want to talk about is perhaps the most inexcusable from AGS. The ticket submission system in place is beyond useless. You have one box with just 1024 characters, yes characters, to explain what happened and why the ban was unjustified. Every time I submitted an appeal I constantly ran into the brick wall that was the character limit. When I finally got unbanned the email I sent was over 8000 characters long with more words used than AGS gave characters. Quite frankly I find it insane how they can expect anyone to submit evidence and justify themselves when they put these limits in place. And submitting evidence itself is an ordeal. There’s no where to upload anything. You’re given one small box to write I can only assume url links to the evidence. However the character limit here is equally problematic so if you want to submit multiple links you have to use your precious explanation box characters. What even more insane here is that I’ve heard from people (some who even work for Amazon though not AGS) that they aren’t allowed to look at anything that is third party. So in the end the urls you provide are pretty much pointless. I gave my game logs every time via a google drive and I’m almost certain that they weren’t looked at once. So in the end, the ticket system in place fails in every way and URGENTLY needs updating to something proper with actual places to upload evidence and at least 3 times the character limit given at the bare minimum. AGS if there’s one thing you take away from this post please fix this. The system is fundamentally broken.

The third thing I want to talk about is what AGS wants as evidence. Other than game logs does anyone know what they want from you? The reasons they give for cheating end up being inconsistent, they don’t give you a timeframe to work with so you have to guess why you’ve actually been banned. When you inevitably ask for clarity on what it is you’ve been banned for ie “was it the trophy bug?” “was it the trading glitch?” “was it using a cheat program?” “was it some other form of cheating?” all they reply is that they can’t and don’t give out that sort of information to avoid people discovering their cheat detection systems. I find that answer to be complete and utter bullshit to be perfectly honest. AGS ban people, demand evidence to lift the ban and then refuse to tell people why they’re banned so they have to guess what evidence to submit. How can anyone submit proper evidence when they don’t know what it is they’re fighting to prove they didn’t do? This isn’t how legal cases are treated in real life. The defendant is always told what it is they’re accused of. Why is it that AGS doesn’t do the same? There’s no reason to it. Correct me if I’m wrong but I can’t figure out how anyone could discover AGS’s cheat detection system just from knowing what it is they’ve been accused of doing. All this reeks of is instead AGS silencing those they banned and refusing to give them a chance to get unbanned.

The fourth thing I want to talk about is how flawed their automatic flagging system is. There is no proper review system in place, or if there is they do an extraordinarily poor job at it. For one, a lot of people who were unjustly banned either took forever to get unbanned after spending hours and hours of effort at it (like myself) or are stuck in limbo with no real way to get unbanned (like 2 people I know). Now I can understand that the review process can take time as human hours add up more than using a bot. But the fact that there are so many account that never got properly reviewed and stuck in limbo or had to work around the system to eventually get unbanned just shows how poor a job they did at reviewing the flagged accounts.
The amount of false positives the automatic flagging system generates is unacceptable with a review process this poor. To see the extremes of these false positives have a look at this image that was shared to me by a friend:

as I’m sure many of you are aware, 4k is nothing in this game in terms of money. If you were going to cheat/exploit to gain more money you’d aim for much much more money than this. Even if you were playing it incredibly conservatively you’d be aiming for 40-50k at the least (which I think is still far too low). Most who cheated I expect were trying to gold cap or maybe even go over that via company banks. So for the system to flag 4k it’s obviously taking the detection to the extremes when it’s clearly apparent this was an accident and due to problems with AGS’ coding/server stability or however the trade glitch occurred and not due to the player who ended up wrongfully banned.

The fifth thing I want to talk about is using this forum as a banned player. If you are banned you are unable to create or comment on posts. Now I can understand why this might be in place but it reinforces the notion that AGS has created everywhere else with appealing bans that they are trying to silence those they ban. When other players were writing posts about the bans and how glad they were that everyone who was banned got what they deserved it was infuriating to not be able to defend myself as an unjustly banned player. And with how bad the appeal system is there’s no where to write your complaints or even try and reach out about why you were unjustly banned. It really added to the feelings of helplessness when trying to get unbanned.

The sixth and final thing I want to talk about is the lack of an apology from AGS. I’ve had 2 months of not being able to play the game. I missed out on the revitalisation of New World player numbers and all the fun of being the first to experience the new content in Brimstone. I’ve fallen behind my friends who still played the game. I missed out on so many days of daily cooldowns and dungeon cooldowns. I’ve missed any time limited events they had going on. I’ve had to spend 2 months in frustration and pain, working much harder than I should have to, to be unbanned. And at the end of it all I haven’t received a word from AGS. No compensation for time lost, no apology for wrongfully banning me and then refusing to unban me until I jumped through more hoops than I’d have liked. I didn’t even get told I had been unbanned by AGS either. I had to be told via the Amazon social media team who were the only reason I was able to successfully fight the ban.

Now I’m not expecting any compensation for my time lost but I’d like AGS to at least apologise and admit they’ve made a mistake, review other players who have been wrongfully banned properly and to please rework the appeal ticket system as it is atrocious.

If anyone else has had any problem with AGS support they want to share I’d like to hear it so I know I’m not alone in feeling that AGS has the worst support team I’ve ever seen in any video game ever.

TLDR: AGS ban appeal system is terrible and fundamentally flawed (look at my second point, third paragraph for more details) and serves to do nothing but silence those who have been unjustly banned

4 Likes

I wholeheartly agree. Bots and weapon exploiters still roam freely…sure some have got banned but there’s too many still. Yet they never hesitate to perma ban people using the exploits they caused by their broken updates. Yes exploiters need to go, but they wrongfully ban people whenever exploits shows up putting them in the same bag with the true exploiters that ruin the game

Sounds like even something simple like Zendesk would have solved a lot of this headache. This sounded like an ordeal that tbh i’m amazed you stuck it out on.

Well… to be fair… its standard for the game industry. You definitely don’t want to account for “how” the ban was triggered. As if you’re writing software to enable various exploits you don’t want to give them a baseline to compare their trial/error against.

As it would be a case of “oh ok, so the aimbot is detectable but not the fishing bot, let me code around that” is how that data can be used by bad faith actors.

You would be very hard pressed to find any MMO that goes into detail on this point.

So does their automatic system just auto-ban or is their human intervention first. As if its just automated then…yeah… they are playing with a loaded weapon that’s clearly not being consistent.

I highly doubt the botters are moving big chunks of gold around for example. I’d fullly expect they have quite complex laundering protocols to handle the movement, and it would be in small increments. Regardless the level of price, the markers were probably the core focus point on this one (which sounds like it was buggy)

I do find it looking at their workflow now, it’s quite silly workflow that if you are banned you have to use the forum to exchange with staff but…you can’t.

It’s like signing up with an internet service provider and being told they’ll email your login details - kinda need the actual internet first their champ :rofl: to see the thing i need to login to the internets.

If what you’ve outlined is spot in terms of truth. You should be compensated sounds like a horrible experience and well at the very least good to have you back in the fold but yes very bad behavior on their AGS.

I once had to go through a similar process with Black Desert Online. TLDR version is at the time i was working at Microsoft and was working with software we were using in the security space - specifically how we enable govt agencies to work with classifications etc. Anyway, BDO assumed one PID in my windows was an attack vector on their game and subsequently the ban process kicked off. It wasn’t until i was able to thankfully prove with certainty my innocence that my ability’s to rejoin was re-enabled. However they deleted my account and loaded me up with compensation after the fact, it was still poor form as that account was one I had since their beta and i ended still ended up second best after all said done.

At the very least they apologized, admitted defeat and tried as best they could to catch me back up on lost time.

1 Like

Well… to be fair… its standard for the game industry. You definitely don’t want to account for “how” the ban was triggered. As if you’re writing software to enable various exploits you don’t want to give them a baseline to compare their trial/error against.

As it would be a case of “oh ok, so the aimbot is detectable but not the fishing bot, let me code around that” is how that data can be used by bad faith actors.

I get it that obviously they can’t give out too much information but they aren’t saying anything. When I’m recieving replies giving different reasons for my ban how can I know which one is the real reason and which are false? I only got 1 response saying I had a cheat program running but that one response is enough to really muddy the waters on what sort of evidence I need to submit. I suppose a lot of this comes down to their stupid usage of copy paste/bot replies to the initial appeals when obviously they were inundated with appeals since they had so many false positives.

So does their automatic system just auto-ban or is their human intervention first. As if its just automated then…yeah… they are playing with a loaded weapon that’s clearly not being consistent.

In this instance it was just automatic bans with human reviews later. The problem is that many people just never got reviewed or at least didn’t get a proper review. I know I didn’t otherwise I would have been unbanned sooner and I know at least 2 other accounts who are still banned who haven’t been reviewed properly yet.

highly doubt the botters are moving big chunks of gold around for example. I’d fullly expect they have quite complex laundering protocols to handle the movement, and it would be in small increments. Regardless the level of price, the markers were probably the core focus point on this one (which sounds like it was buggy)

Sure but there would be a lot more suspicious activitey on the account than just the occasional money transfer. If at the end of the day the amount of money the accidental usage of the exploit creates is miniscule then they shouldn’t be banning account first and not properly following up on it later.

If what you’ve outlined is spot in terms of truth.

Unfortuately it is. The reality is there’s still innocent players who haven’t been unbanned yet and are stuck in a limbo with no real way to get out of it thanks to how terrible the ticket submission system is. Tbh I count myself very lucky that the Amazon social media team actually took my email to them seriously and sent it to the higher ups so it actually got looked at.

Oh well thats just an epic fail on their part. They broke into jail the minute they confirmed one way or another “why” the reasoning for the ban occurred.

They need to come up with a better protocol on what they need to counteract their reasons or data points for a ban.

In your case “suspicious gold activity” is the core reason right. Well, probing on their part is more to do with flagging how you arrive at your income and asset acquisition without giving away that the initial transfer is what triggered the ban.

As i also have heard reports from other players who were also banned and unbanned for this reason prior to FSS i think it was.

I wish society would just stop this. I’d rather you just be silent then be obtuse and arrogant to just script the reply. As all you’re saying to an end user “lalalalaa not listening f-off” … its such a redundant form communication that tbh just increases the aggression not deescalate it.

Yup well thats just stupid and anyone in AGS who floated this as a winning idea should be sat down and given a lecture on empathy instead of apathy.

100% … there should be many markers here not just one.

Its a probabiliy score system not a instant data flow filter. For example in RUST, the cheat detection works on a plethora of micro data points to arrive at a player cheating. Everything from where their ray-tracing gets positive hits (ie seeing people through rocks), perfection levels on which part of the body shots are hiting and the rate of consistancy and so on. The thing that cheaters don’t fully grasp thankfully is humans are by nature imperfect. They are not consistant in various metrics that you look for to ascertain “human” vs “non-human” traits.

You also can get a 99% probabilty but still be wrong. As even in cases of RUST something can shift, for example recently it was that the AK47 changed its recoil pattern so anti-cheat protocols were throwing red flags everywhere on players. As it kept saying “these people shouldn’t be that accurate with Ak47 as they are all above the median thresholds” …but…it was a change in the behavior from the devs which didn’t align with the anti-cheat.

Again which is why automated systems are problematic.

Lets face it, there is just not enough volume of players in New World to justify an automated system.

See empathy wins over apathy. AGS need to lead with empathy at all times in this space, as its not like comercial software where my CTO makes me adopt X application. This is a game, its opt-in and if you come up short i opt-out for .

What i am getting somewhat tired of is gaming studios carry a level of hubris in terms of how they approach audiences. Somewhere it somehow got agreed upon that your audience is “dumber than your team”.

Turns out your audience is probably got a plethora of people with resumes that make your best team member look like an apprentice in whatever field they look after. So when they talk about “oh this darn game development thingy is too complicated for you to understand” well… its really not and all you’re doing is demonstrating “you’re actually full of b.s and its clear your house isn’t in order”.

Just be honest, say “we made a mistake we’re fixing it heres why” or “we can’t do xyz because we’ve commited to these features and only these features”.

Too much “we’re working on it” b.s which translates to “its in the backlog but not even sure if a feature team has even opened that card to begin with” :smiley:

I digress… empathy is important.

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed 21 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.