My Dream Patch (PVP focused)

[Oromis]

@some_noob

• Players may now only participate in 2 wars per day, to help combat shell companies from cheesing siege windows with the same “A team” roster

I agree with most of your suggestions, but this most of all. This will limit having around 50 very good players using multiple companies with different wardec schedules to control the server. I would say the limit could even be 1 war per day. A full company has members for two wars, in the same company or not.

I hope it gets the attention of AGS fast since this does not look like a big change.

[Goyle]

@some_noob

My dream

Our Vision For Combat: What Happened? v2.0

DISCLAIMER: To anyone familiar with the original post, very little has changed. This is just a continuation of the most popular discussion from closed Beta. We finally made it to launch my friends. It’s been an interesting year and a half since the original launch date with a lot of ups and downs. Still, as the population of the game has increased, so too have the complaints surrounding the combat system. Anyone who played in the early Alphas or the Preview can immediately tell where those issu…

[Zelme]

Hey there, Some_Noob,
In order to help keep your dreams alive this holiday season, I have compiled a report based on your post. Have a great day!

[some_noob]

@Indignation

Terrible

I don’t know why you think restricting players is a good option.

it’s all subjective really, so I respect your opinion even if you disagree!

To give a little context, i’m on one of these “a team” rosters. Every 2 days the same 50 people (± 10) defend the 4 most profitable territories on our server. We would sweep the server with ease if it didn’t mean destroying the server (this has happened on many servers already). What has ended up happening is that we have all learned to play with eachother really well & with the gold from the major territories (EF + WW mostly) we are all super geared. the wars arn’t even close anymore, many people don’t get to participate, & it feels like the competitive aspect of the server is decaying.

I hate restrictions too, but letting the same 50 people defend as many territories as they want is doing serious damage to the game, imo

[some_noob]

@Zelme

I have compiled a report based on your post. Have a great day!

Thanks! you as well!

[PsyBot]

what about pvp drops? gold from the loser?

[some_noob]

@Indignation

It won’t and it’s a bad idea, all you’re doing is again restricting players to play how YOU want them to play.

There’s nothing “organic” about it.

while I disagree, I respect your opinion on this. Personally I don’t think changing the loot luck formula is restricting anyone from doing anything. If people still want to zerg, have at it! the loot luck formula in general was an incentive for pvp, all I’m suggesting is tweaking the formula for higher quality pvp (skills instead of number of bodies)

[some_noob]

@PsyBot

what about pvp drops? gold from the loser?

currently there is a chance to get gear from kills (and even expertise upgrades). I personally prefer this to introducing another source of gold drops, but if it was a relatively small amount (enough to cover repair costs from world pvp) I could be convinced!

[Beater]

without “World PVP changes”, i agree 100%

Will be a other game, so much better.

[Waylander]

Some good idea’s

@some_noob

We are also happy to introduce 10v10 capture the flag. This mode will have a casual mode than can be queued for just like OPR, and a rated mode that requires you to queue with 10 members of the same company

Fuck the company part. Just let anyone join of said faction. Of course the option should be there for people to group up with company/friends. This and all instanced pvp should be cross server.

Edit: I read this wrong, yeah I agree.

[some_noob]

@WeGbored

(I really hope one day we can get to a spot where cross-server wars are possible to really add a king of the hill aspect and promote server unity )

right? imagine a cross server war tournament from the sweatiest guilds? not only would that pull huge viewing numbers on twitch (which would be great for the game), but it would be extremely fun to participate in

[PsyBot]

dont get me wrong.

im in favor of the dead guy dropping this gold from his own gold

[PsyBot]

also this fits perfectly with my gameplay

World PVP:

• We’ve updated how flagged loot luck works to give +20% luck so long as you are not within 100 meters of more than 4 other flagged members of your faction, and +0% when within more than 10 (scaling proportionally in between). We hope this will help promote organic non-zerg world pvp. We’ve also added a small tooltip to the PVP flagged indicator to show how many flagged faction members are within 100 meters

New World - SOLO - Open World PVP - 7

always solo open world fighting the zerg

[PsyBot]

u should stop zerging bro. be more confident sometimes.

[some_noob]

@PsyBot

also this fits perfectly with my gameplay

nice video! I too enjoy the higher risk / higher reward tradeoff

[Potawatomii]

@Indignation

@some_noob

Players may now only participate in 2 wars per day, to help combat shell companies from cheesing siege windows with the same “A team” roster

Terrible

I don’t know why you think restricting players is a good option.

He gives his reasoning right there in the quote. To restrict having only ‘a teams’ from participating in wars. I SUPPORT THIS. it will lead to many more players being able to play. Unless there aren’t enough players to fill all wars in a day.

[Indignation]

@PsyBot

u should stop zerging bro. be more confident sometimes.

Stop assuming how I play the game and focus on how you play the game

Bro

[lukes1992]

Great!

[xChadThunderx]

nice