I mean better players getting slots is only fair. That being said, i also think there should have “lesser wars” like first light and low income turfs that should consider begginers.
In my server ALL THE COMPANIES agreed to divide turfs in S, A, B and C tiers.
A company that is in tier S for instance, can not atack B and C tier, and if they’re to atack tier A they should hand out the turf to someone in A tier.
Someone in Tier A cannot take B tier turfs and on and on it goes.
Honestly it works, but only because players respect it, probably try to do the same in your server and it’ll probably work too.
Have only recently returned. Anyway, this has been an issue which has been haunting this game for a long time. And I’ve said it at many occasion in the past, just create a War instanced PvP mode for shits and giggles. One where you just sign up for, just is ran for fun, without implications in the world. This way everybody can participate in the game mode. Whilst those all too fussed about territory ownership have nothing to worry about.
AGS again looking at the WRONG issue.
Rate of participation is not the real problem
WHY someone gets chosen or kicked is the problem and has been since launch.
idk bro, ur the one replying, all im saying is deflection. If you’re replying to me replying, are you really any different? we have joint rooms in eachothers heads cutie. Go try and start an argument on another thread, this one has u beat.
I play since closed beta and played war maybe 4 times including beta. OPR is boring af, because of premades/cheaters/not balanced teams. Arena is too small scale pvp for me for mmo, not fun at all.
I think its ridiculus that war has to be balanced 50/50 players. War should be war! If you have 300 ppl let them all play, this is damn mmo and if enemy has 25 its theirs problem.
I agree, however, that was when recruitment was taking place on a large scale. You can STILL be a player who invests time into themselves, adjusts to war metas, network with big companies and is willing to learn from them.
Unless you are already coming from a big company, you have no idea how wars work, so if you cannot be humble and adapt you will achieve nothing. Big companies take in players all the time to coach others so that they can broaden their selection, fill gaps in the roster or replace those who have fallen off.
The hoops you have to jump through are now much smaller but that does not make it impossible
I hear you however, why would I subject myself to such a farce? When there are MMOs like GW2 and ESO, where I can jump straight into the action without having to jump through a fraction of the hoops.
I mean I wonder how many of these returning and or new players will stay, once they get to these gates? I’m willing to bet less than 10% of them.
If New World and its community want a healthy and active PvP scene. Then they will have to make this game’s PvP scene, as inclusive as other MMOs’ that it’s trying to compete with. Because as it stands right now, if you like PvP, you’ll skip New World and go play MMOs like GW2, ESO, or even BDO these days.
Just the other day in willys stream… on Valhalla one of the top companies had some drama… guess top war loggers where taking money to gear up alts… to compete in more wars… but, hey they preach server health and not gate keeping
I unfortunately don’t have any experience with other mmorpgs but that’s a solid point. Does the pvp in those games give advantages like wars in NW do? I’m sure that you can appreciate that 50 people winning a territory on a server with 2000+ players leads to competition and any non-competitive avenues would result in anarchy regardless of how fun it may be for those players.
I cannot imagine public queued wars without seeing 35 bow/muskets on either side with 1/2 healers and the rest bruisers and AGS can’t reliably make war slots role specific because the game is classless.
I do like what I’ve seen of @IDarkStar 's proposition of tiered territories though.
hey, why not be the great players you say you are and hold territories under one company.
stop with the shell company bs. just because you can doesn’t mean you should. it’s only because ags can’t 100% confirm the exploiting against the intended game design (well, maybe they also want your transfer and alt account money…i digress). too much profits? put the extra money back into the economy to help keep the game alive. gear other players, help them become your worthy opponents. if no other players, who will you play against? defending against newer/lesser-experienced/lesser-geared players isn’t the achievement you think it is. people leave or other people give up and join the toxicity because it’s easier. it’s just a game after all, and the meta of trying to help ags keep the game alive while passively fueling your delusional gatekeeping is exhausting.
one thing i like about this game is the 3 faction system. i think that a company worthy of a territory should be able to slot most of their own, HOWEVER, the map should be more dynamic, constantly changing. there’s how many war-interested players on every night? a large portion of the game they worked towards shouldn’t be gatekept from them, but also the 3 faction mechanic shouldn’t be ignored. i mean, if not, what’s the point of factions? ags had posted that spiderman meme, maybe they’ve given up on the 3 faction mechanic. i can see how it’s hard from an enforecment perspective the use of alt accounts and shell companies, while trying to maintain as much of what makes this game different as possible.
