i just said in my post
bro its not lol. stop making stories up we tested it several times. resilience only now effects crits which is still good
yeah and its bugged
How are some of you in here so obtuse. Its obviously calculating incorrectly.
Crits are supposed to do extra damage to a player. Even if resilience cuts how much damage the crit does, its still supposed to be more damage than just a regular hit.
I mean even the developers got the calculation wrong so I can understand that some random people donât know maths either.
2 Likes
Sure its bugged.
Only the damage thats added to the normal damage when someone crits should be reduced. That way a hit deals at least the damage it would do with a normal attack.
Or make the perk so you have a chance (max. 30%) to negate the critting, making it only a normal hit.
Thatâs not what the resilient perk says. Idk why people are assuming it does something different than what it explicitly says.
Ex: Critical hits deal 4.8% less damage to you. It doesn't say damage, it says the hit. The hit becomes critical, well, when it crits.
The issue is NOT that it is still bugged. Itâs working as intended. The issue is that the intended function makes a damage amplification actually do less damage than base. Critical hit reduction should not be calculated this way.
Potential Fixes:
- Have Resiliant only calculate on the critical portion of the damage, leaving the base damage unaffected.
- Reduce possible resilient stat % to less than 20% (lowest crit modifier is 120%) so that no matter what it will not reduce to less than the base damage.
- Increase overall crit damage to a point where no crit damage can be reduced lower than the base damage.
Personally the first option seems to be the best long term solution, however, it may be more difficult to implement that calculation than the other 2.
âIt doesnât say damage, it says the hit.â
Bro stop trying to overcomplicate the situation. The current formula is demonstrably incorrect and should be adjusted as I state in my opening post.
That is a huge issue. I was always wondering why it seemed that my crit damage seemed offâŚ
The spear is awful in most situations anyways, but I still love using it. Hopefully they look at this.
Yeah its incredibly dumb to make all of the skill it takes to head shot or backstab go down the drain because of this bad calculation being made by a single perk.
Donât be salty, it could be worse and work as it SHOULD in a perfect PVP world, negating the % of receiving a critical hit, and not a % absorb.
If they fix the formula, they can always just increase the percentages slightly so that its still useful but just not overpowered.
Dude, it wasnât nerfed, it was fixed. Get in trough your head.
Youâre the one âovercomplicatingâ it.
It says Critical hits deal 4.8% less damage to you.
My interpretation: Ok, when a hit crits, the damage it deals is reduced by x %.
Your interpretation: Ok, when a hit crits, the base damage remains unchanged and only the critical damage portion of the overall hit is reduced by x %.
One of these is obviously more complicated. Stop being pedantic while projecting it on me.
2 Likes
Hope you are trolling or maybe retake highschool maths 101
Bottom line is that you are being penalized for shoting someone in the head or hitting them in the back. That just canât be right.
More skill, with better aim or better positioning, should never equal less damage imo.
Itâs not a math question, it is a interpretation question. Itâs about what what part of the overall hitâs damage the % reduction should be applied to. Your interpretation is more complicated.
Resorting to insults isnât going to get you anywhere.
I never disagreed with that, I disagreed that itâs a bug. Itâs not a bug, itâs working as they intended, however, that intention is wrong and the implementation should be changed. Critical damage should never go below base.
Just turn the back to the enemies in WAR to take less damages xD
New Meta on the way folks ! The reverse army !
1 Like
Maybe read what your own words are before crying for what I wrote in response.