Why would i leave a positive review for a game that is a mess. ½ finished. Poorly designed content that keeps getting ignored. The game has the worst aggro mecanics i have seen in a game. Respawn timer is a mess. And other issues… But we get nerfs to prolong the content.
OP is a mindless fanboy that simps for the game. You are part of issue. You defend garbage like this, and try to get people to make positive reviews, for a game that shouldn’t get positive reviews
3 Likes
So because others have done it in the past, it’s okay to do it? So if someone punches you in the face, it’s okay for the rest of us to punch you in the face. Because others have done it. Stop defending ½ finished games. Yes games will have bugs. But some of the issues this game has/had could have been avoided if they had actualy tested it and not rushed it. It’s mindless fanboys like you that ruins the industry, because you keep defending garbage like this. I would assume you also buy Fifa every year. The game has had quite a bit of gold exploits/duplication of items, in a short amount of time.
I’ve examined it, and no they aren’t.
Noted. I left a 100% positive review for the game on Steam to counterbalance the unwarranted hostility.
KEKW. it must be sarcasm
So, basically, you left a review that glosses over the real problems the game is having, and are lying to prospective buyers, to ‘counter’ the bad reviews.
Congrats; you’re part of the problem.
Sorry, I don’t see any of the problems so many others point out. Low population? They gave you a token to transfer. If you didn’t use it or transferred to a low population server, that’s not AGS’ fault.
The problems like the exploits, the multiple duping exploits, the slap-on-the-wrist punishment for duping, the bots…
These are all real problems, even if you ignore them.
In fact; ignoring them to leave a good review to ‘counterbalance’ the bad reviews makes you a liar and makes your review as much as, or more toxic, than the bad reviews.
1 Like
I don’t exploit, so I don’t have a problem. Maybe if you exploit and get banned, that seems reasonable as well.
Wow, are you that thick?
Exploiters are a problem even if you don’t exploit.
I don’t cheat, but I know cheaters are a problem because I’m not a self-absorbed prick.
But it’s clear you live in a tiny bubble where only you matter to you, and thus you see no problem with lying in a review, because it makes you feel better, and you hope it brings more people into a game you like, even under false pretenses.
1 Like
Just curious what’s your level and watermark? How many crafting professions do you have at 200? How many wars per week are you doing? I’m just asking so I can understand your perspective. I’m not trying to shame anyone but I loved this game for the first 40 levels and then the bad became clearer. The more I played the worse the game was.
I’m level 60, have max armorcrafting and arcane.
I’ve joined many wars, but unfortunately the company kick me instantly because i’m not in their company. I haven’t been allowed in any invasions either: instantly kicked. I’m in a small company and thus we aren’t allowed in wars/invasions. I spend my time doing open world PvP and outpost rush. I own three houses with lots of different trophies.
I’ve made about 150,000 coin and my current gearscore is 593. I’ve played about 700 hours according to Steam.
Yeah how about we leave honest feedback on the game on Steam and not a bunch of propaganda fake news. The game has some major flaws to be addressed. Population is tanking and the bots are still an issue, they just moved off the main worlds and into the OPR where they make far more money or they are all on low pop servers and are waiting for the merges to cash in.
3 Likes
So your review basically boils down to recommending a consumer pay 40$, all because you had a bone to pick with other players?
Jesus Christ.
Interesting. Well that blows my theory entirely. I’m glad you like the game but I left a negative review because I can’t in good consciousness help recruit players for a game that has no direction in development. Is it a pvp game or a pve game? Once they decide that maybe people will be more satisfied with what’s left.
Territorial PVP games are about playing politics. Either you’re in or you’re out based on company leadership. If leadership isn’t making connections with other companies to get you on war rosters then it’s time to look for another company. Those who put in the effort to push a territory, gather a significant number of people, gear and coordinate them don’t want to carry randoms. Had this debate with small companies frequently. The large companies don’t exist purely to carry others along with them, fair or not; same faction or not.
Sure, when they earn it.
AGS said that they are aware of how companies kick people from playing in invasions and wars, and they’re working on finding a solution. I’ll give them time while I play outpost rush and open world PvP.
Great game.
nope, they busted the game to the point can’t trade or craft, why would i give them a positive review? better yet go check out the bugs and exploits section, go have a read over the trello page tracking bugs that have existed since launch.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.