Well, their changes were probably hotfixes so they just railroaded them to Prod. It is pretty bad practice but understandable.
What I don’t understand is why the same issues keep reoccurring. Do they not have unit tests and integration tests?
Whats truly insulting is that AGS continues to release untested patches when they have the tools at their disposal to prevent this stuff from happening, they opt to not use those tools though.
That said, I am not actually throwing insults around like you think I am. I am simply stating the facts of what has happened before, and what just happened again.
I would say it would be understandable if AGS had a track record of being able to implement hotfixes without consistently breaking things, doesn’t seem the case though 
Yup. Every day, I get more curious as to how the game ended up this way. Who came up with the Gypsum System? The Umbral System? The timegates?
They are running the game like they run a social media platform like Facebook. Facebook has very good metrics on engagement and do their best to maximize that number.
It feels like the NW team is doing the same thing, not realizing a game has to be fun as well.
2 Likes
I agree 100%, this seems to be the main success meter that they’re going by. Nice analysis, short and sweet.
1 Like
The OP asks a good question…
I just farmed a crapload of starmetal and wyrdwood for my wife, that I was going to refine and give to her tonite to help level her Furnishing crafting…my warehouses are jammed with mats…
Not to mention that last night in OPR I experienced some kind of wierd collision everywhere bug that made it impossible for me to move, unless I hopped…never saw that before.
Every patch breaks something.
Why have a PTR and not use it to test patches?
Welcome to the internet.
Have you worked at a gaming company before? There is usually not unit and integration testing in the same style you would see at other types of software development. There is lots of manual testing and reporting that happens from QA teams.
1 Like
Insults…? All is see is criticism of actions.
2 Likes
No, it isn’t my industry, but there has to be some sort of regression testing going on. Do videogames completely rely on QA teams, and the devs testing their own work? That sounds like a recipe for disaster.
In theory that’s what a PTR is for, BUT they have a release schedule to maintain. So it’ll go out ready or not with whatever cobbled together fixes (barely tested) that they can throw together.
They might be capable of better releases but the way they talk about their code, it sounds bloated and excessively complicated and that any real fix of core mechanics is basically a redo of the entire game.
Automated testing is done at some studios but not others in my experience. Many large companies and AAA gaming studies I have worked have moved to CI based solutions without unit testing and have staffed up large groups of cheap labor QA people for manual testing the game. They are very poorly paid, usually younger, and worked very hard. They write up reports which are then given to a QA manager who forwards them over to engineering for fixes. Most games are built on 3rd party engines, so at most you can test the calls to these engines without having leaky tests, but the game itself lives in the UI. Why would they pay engineers who salary is 200K+ to write indeterministic automated tests when you have a younger kid making minimum wage who can manually test it for you every time. Many of the types of bugs you see in games are collision based or UI based. Remember video games are not like most software development where at least 50% of the people making a product are engineers, its more like 15-20%, and problems can exist from any of their output including artwork. Most things are not deterministic in this environment. All in all the games with tons of bugs like this are usually due to poor leadership, poor structure and process, and just a sign of dysfunction, not necessarily inept or bad engineers.
1 Like
The leads, that’s who. Someone, I don’t know which one but there is at least one predominant lead who’s appeared in dev videos, is digging their heels in on the time gating and orbs system. That was reflected in the very poorly thought out response by one CM in particular.
1 Like
They said it was to test their monthly patches and the only way they can collect data and find bugs is for people to play on the pts.
You guys complain about the devs not listening, which they do, but don’t listen yourselves.
New World credits list. If this is accurate, and the credit list for the Designers is accurate, then only one designer was involved in designing anything even remotely successful (GW2 and GW2:HoT). The rest are either new at game design, or have a history with games that were not what you would call “good”.
well those are those mobile game devs all being tasked to make content. all content mobile games can make are timegates 
1 Like
Well i installed PTR yesterday to test some things. I had no access to Voidbent Ingot and no items to craft legendary named weapons like the warpwood bow to test some things with items that are 100 % 600 GS by crafting them. Unfortunately the tester chests dont give any of the materials i would have needed. Uninstalled within 20 minutes because i am not willing to grind this items on a PTR.
Oh and btw when i created my first character i had to delete it after 5 minutes because when i opened 4 of the testers chests then i was encumbered and couldnt move. The problem was i couldnt even drop this items from my inventory so my character was stuck at one place.
I gave it another try though with another character…
What on earth are you talking about? PTR exists to test new content.
How are they not listening to the community? Up until now they are listening to pretty much every community demand in ptrs and change what is reasonable…
1 Like
because if the bug doesnt occur in PTR they cant fix it? XD
1 Like
opens chests
gets too many items
cant move
creates new character
demands more items to be included in the chests